Exchanges, wallets, marketplaces and DeFi protocols. Security review is part of the build, not a phase after it — a fast matching engine or a clever router means nothing if custody, a contract, or a royalty rule is the weak point someone finds first.
Matching engines built for latency first, with custody and compliance fit around that constraint.
Non-custodial wallets where recovery gets as much design attention as security.
Minting, listings and royalty enforcement written into the contract, not the terms of service.
AMMs, liquidity pools and routing logic, audited before they touch real liquidity.
Contracts and custody models get reviewed as part of the build, not after an incident.
Matching engines and routers built for speed, because a slow exchange loses institutional flow.
Multi-signature withdrawal approval and hot/warm/cold separation, every time.
We start with the problem, not the tech. A short scoping conversation tells us whether this is a fit before either of us commits real time.
A small senior team, not a rotating cast. You talk to the people actually writing the code.
Load testing, security review and edge cases — the unglamorous work that decides whether it holds up in production.
We stay involved after launch. Software that works on day one and still works on day two hundred.
Tell us what you're trying to build. We'll tell you honestly whether it's a fit.
Start a conversation →